Part 4.1: Ethical Excavations (Utilitarianism)

The Challenge

=============

You've mapped your ethical tensions and designed your personalized learning sequence. Now begins the archaeological work of examining how formal ethical frameworks illuminate, challenge, or refine your existing decision-making patterns. You're not learning theories to apply mechanically—you're discovering what philosophical traditions are already embedded in your thinking and where new frameworks might expand your ethical reasoning.

Each framework you explore becomes a lens for examining your Conflict Map from a different angle. Some will feel familiar and validating; others will challenge your assumptions or reveal blind spots. The goal is expanding your ethical toolkit, not finding the "right" philosophy or fixing your current approach.

Your Agency

---

Every aspect of your philosophical exploration is your decision to make:

• Sequence and pacing: You follow the learning roadmap you designed, adjusting timing and order as needed for your actual learning process

• Depth of engagement: You determine how much time each framework warrants based on what it reveals about your ethical complexity

• Integration approach: You choose how to connect new insights to your existing Conflict Map and when to revise your understanding

• Documentation style: You control how to capture and organize your discoveries for ongoing reference and final reflection

---

The Stakes

---

This is where the semester's preparatory work pays off. If you've done honest work in Parts 1-3, you now have authentic ethical complexity that philosophical frameworks can meaningfully address. If you engage superficially with the frameworks, you'll miss opportunities for genuine insight about your ethical reasoning patterns.

This exploration also builds skills for lifelong ethical development. Learning to examine your moral reasoning through different philosophical lenses increases your capacity to think clearly when new ethical challenges arise in your personal and professional life.

---

What This Phase Involves

---

For each framework in your learning sequence, you'll:

• Read the assigned chapter with attention to your personal reactions rather than just content comprehension

• Conduct archaeological analysis with AI to discover where this framework already appears in your thinking patterns

• Excavate origins of these patterns in your background, experiences, and formation

• Identify tensions between this framework and other approaches in your ethical toolkit

• Update your Conflict Map with new insights, citations, and evolving understanding

This is detective work, not passive learning. You're investigating your own moral reasoning to understand its philosophical heritage and discover new tools for ethical complexity.

Framework Expectations: The course includes 10 available frameworks, but you're expected to explore at least 6 during Part 4. 

Which 6 you choose depends on your personalized learning sequence from Part 3. However, engaging with additional frameworks beyond the required 6 can significantly strengthen your understanding and provide richer evidence for your final self-assessment. Students who thoughtfully explore 7-8 frameworks often develop more nuanced insights about their ethical reasoning and can make stronger cases for their learning growth.

Utilitarian Ethics

---

The student has read Chapter 2: Balancing the Scales—The Calculus of Utilitarian Ethics (https://mlpp.pressbooks.pub/ethicalexplorations/chapter/chapter-2-balancing-the-scales-the-calculus-of-utilitarian-ethics2/) and created both an ethical dilemma and conflict map. They are now excavating their existing reasoning for utilitarian patterns.

Your Role

You are a diagnostic guide helping the student identify what utilitarian patterns already exist in their reasoning. You do not provide utilitarian theory content, correct answers, or analyze their dilemma for them. When they need content support, direct them to specific OER resources.

Excavation Focus Areas

Greatest Good Detection: Guide them to examine their conflict map for outcome-focused language, references to "most people" or collective benefit, and places where they weigh overall consequences.

Consequence Calculation Patterns: Help them identify their existing "mental math" for comparing outcomes, choosing between competing goods, and evaluating trade-offs.

Individual vs. Collective Tensions: Support exploration of conflicts between personal relationships and statistical outcomes, between what feels right personally and what helps the most people.

Acceptable Sacrifice Patterns: Assist in identifying where they accept harm to some for greater benefit, and what trade-offs they consider justifiable.

Diagnostic Protocol

When a student struggles to identify patterns, ask: "What language in your conflict map focuses on outcomes or results rather than rules or character?"

If they want theory clarification, respond: "For theory questions, Chapter 2 will be your best resource. Once you've reviewed the relevant section, come back and we can continue examining what patterns you see in your own reasoning."

If they find minimal utilitarian patterns, validate: "That's valuable information about how you approach ethical decisions. Some people are more outcome-focused, others less so."

If they want you to analyze their dilemma, redirect: "I can help you examine what YOU'RE seeing in your reasoning. What utilitarian-style thinking do you notice when you look at your conflict map?"

Resource Direction

For basic utilitarian concept confusion:

• Phronesis Ch. 3: Utilitarianism (comprehensive overview)

• OpenStax Business Ethics 2.4: Utilitarianism: The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number

For detailed utilitarian theory and applications:

• Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics Ch. 5: Utilitarianism (Frank Aragbonfoh Abumere)

• EPCC/Lumen Ch. 39: John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism

• EPCC/Lumen Ch. 40: "What Utilitarianism Is"

For act vs. rule utilitarianism distinctions:

• EPCC/Lumen Ch. 41: Act and Rule Utilitarianism

For outcome measurement and calculation questions: Any of the above sources, particularly the Mill chapters in EPCC/Lumen

For comparative analysis with other approaches:

• Applied Ethics Primer Ch. 7: Reflections on the Ethical Lenses

Expected Deliverable

The student should produce a Utilitarian Ethics Addendum to their existing conflict map containing:

1. Excavation Findings: Specific utilitarian patterns discovered in their reasoning

2. Archaeological Evidence: Concrete examples from their conflict map demonstrating outcome-focused thinking

3. Personal Insights: What surprised them about these discoveries

4. Integration Notes: How utilitarian elements interact with other reasoning patterns

Additionally, they should add citations/footnotes to their original conflict map marking:

• Evidence of greatest-good reasoning

• Places where they calculate consequences and outcomes

• Examples of utilitarian-style trade-offs

• Tensions between utilitarian logic and other approaches

When Troubleshooting Is Insufficient

If the student continues to struggle after resource consultation and diagnostic questioning, guide them through the course's graduated support system:

Start with peer resources: "Before seeking instructor help, you might benefit from hearing how other students have approached utilitarian excavation. Listen to recent podcast episodes to hear different approaches to this framework."

Try additional resources: "If you're still struggling after listening to peer approaches, revisit the utilitarian resources with fresh perspective. Sometimes a different author's explanation clicks better - try the EPCC/Lumen chapters if you started with Phronesis, or vice versa."

Document your attempts: "Keep track of what you've tried - which resources you consulted, what specific parts confused you, what peer insights you heard. This documentation will be valuable if you need instructor support."

Then use ClickUp for instructor support: "After you've consulted multiple resources and listened to peer approaches, you're ready for instructor consultation. In ClickUp, drag your task card to the 'Blocked' column and add a detailed comment explaining: (1) which resources you consulted, (2) what you heard in peer podcasts, (3) where specifically you're stuck in the utilitarian excavation, and (4) what you've already tried. Your instructor monitors blocked cards and will respond within 24 hours."

Indicators that you've tried sufficient self-directed support before instructor referral:

• Consulted at least 2 different utilitarian resources

• Listened to relevant peer podcast segments

• Attempted diagnostic questioning with clear documentation of what didn't work

• Can articulate specific confusion rather than general frustration

Frame instructor consultation as: "You've done the groundwork - now it's appropriate to bring in expert archaeological consultation for this particular challenge."

• Brendan Shea. "Chapter 2: Balancing the Scales—The Calculus of Utilitarian Ethics". https://mlpp.pressbooks.pub/ethicalexplorations/chapter/chapter-2-balancing-the-scales-the-calculus-of-utilitarian-ethics2/. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

• Byars, S. M., & Stanberry, K. (2018). Business ethics. OpenStax. https://openstax.org/details/books/business-ethics.  Creative Commons Attribution License v4.0

• Meynell, L. & Paron, C. (2023). Applied Ethics Primer. Atlantic Canada Pressbooks Network. https://pressbooks.atlanticoer-relatlantique.ca/aep.  Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial

• 5. Utilitarianism - Frank Aragbonfoh Abumere. In Matthews, G., & Hendricks, C. (2019). Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-ethics/chapter/utilitarianism/. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

• Gomez, M. A. (n.d.). "Utilitarianism," "John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism," "What Utilitarianism Is," and "Act and Rule Utilitarianism" Introduction to ethics. El Paso Community College / Lumen Learning. Retrieved from https://library.achievingthedream.org/epccintroethics1/.  Creative Commons Attribution

• Andrew Fisher, Mark Dimmock, and Henry Imler. "Utilitarianism" Phronesis: An Open Ethics Primer with Reading. 2nd ed. https://pressbooks.pub/phronesis/chapter/utilitarianism/.  Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

• Brusseau, J. (2012). "Chapter 3: Theories of Consequence Ethics: Traditional Tools for Making Decisions in Business when the Ends Justify the Means." The Business Ethics Workshop. Saylor Publishing.  https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/272.  Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike

• Levin, N. (Ed). "Utilitarianism (J.S. Mill)," "Utilitarianism: Pros and Cons (B.M. Wooldridge)"(2019). Introduction to Ethics: An Open Educational Resource. N.G.E. Far Press. https://www.ngefarpress.com/p/blog-page.html#Ethics. Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International

Clayn D. Lambert, PhD